Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 07:03:20 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and Unicode (was: Re: Arid Canaanite Wasteland)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

For what it is worth, I think the casing conventions "mn" vs "MN" vs
"Mong" are useful, and I don't know why software needs to disregard
it. But even if software does have to do so for good reasons, there's
no reason that one can't exercise discipline and always follow the
casing conventions for clarity.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and Unicode (was: Re: Arid Canaanite Wasteland)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT