Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Wed May 12 2004 - 00:09:36 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Phoenician"

    On 11/05/2004 05:44, Patrick Andries wrote:

    >
    >> Peter Kirk a écrit :
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> And these two cases are hardly a good advertisement for the expert's
    >>> reputation. The Coptic/Greek unification proved to be ill-advised and
    >>> is being undone.
    >>
    > I'm rather surprised by this comment. If the Coptic/Greek unification
    > proved to be ill-advised how could you defend what I see, if I recall
    > properly, as your (original ?) position : Phoenician/Hebrew unification ?
    >
    > P. A.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Because each such case has to be judged on its individual merits,
    according to proper justification and user requirements. There can be no
    hard rules like "always split" or "always join". 

    -- 
Peter Kirk
peter@qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 12 2004 - 00:12:00 CDT