RE: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)

From: Jony Rosenne (rosennej@qsm.co.il)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 03:14:57 CDT

  • Next message: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
    > [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mark E. Shoulson
    > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:47 PM
    > To: Dean Snyder
    > Cc: Unicode List
    > Subject: Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved
    > ordering; was, Phoenician)
    >
    >
    > Dean Snyder wrote:
    >
    > >My question is, do you really care what ANYBODY says about
    > encoding or
    > >not encoding Phoenician, or has your mind been made up for
    > 10 years and
    > >nothing can change it now?
    > >
    > But they *DID* listen to what people had to say about it.
    > Some said one
    > thing, some said the other. A decision must, necessarily, go against
    > the opinion of at least one party.

    There is another option - to postpone the decision. If the question is
    controversial, and consent impossible to achieve, this is often the best
    choice.

    >
    ...

    > ~mark
    >

    Jony



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 02:17:15 CDT