Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)

From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 21:25:45 CDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"

    Michael Everson wrote:

    > One last try.
    >
    > At 16:21 -0400 2004-05-14, Dean Snyder wrote:
    >
    >> Michael Everson wrote at 7:29 PM on Thursday, May 13, 2004:
    >>
    >>> At 11:44 -0400 2004-05-13, Dean Snyder wrote:
    >>>
    >>
    >> It's your dogmatic assertion that Phoenician/Palaeo-Hebrew is a
    >> different
    >> script (in the ENCODING sense of that word) from Jewish Hebrew.
    >
    >
    > No, it's my considered opinion[....]
    >
    >> I disagree.
    >
    >
    > I know you do.

    This discussion has been spinning its wheels. At this point, we keep
    yelling at each other "It's the same script!" "No, it's two different
    ones!" but there's nothing new left to dispute. It's safe to say that
    the two sides disagree here, and always will. Further "discussion" is
    mostly a lot of hot air and wasted electrons

    ~mark

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 21:26:41 CDT