RE: [BULK] - Re: problems in Public Review 33 UTF Conversion Code Update

From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 19:13:24 CDT

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Is there a better term than metascript for what I am thinking of?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
Behalf Of Philippe Verdy
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:21 PM

> However I feel it's not legal (or really not recommanded) to encode non-
> character codepoints xFFFE-xFFFF where x is any plane number. So the rules
> need to be a bit more detailed to exclude them.

Why do we need special rules to not encode characters that don't
exist?

/|/|ike

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Is there a better term than metascript for what I am thinking of?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 19 2004 - 19:14:54 CDT