Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 09:15:34 CDT

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:51 -0700 2004-05-20, Patrick Andries wrote:
>Antoine Leca a écrit :
>
>>The French name for Hang looks strange. It happened to be "hangul (hangul,
>>hangeul)" (after quite a bit of discussion.)
>>
>
>The name in ISO/CEI 10646 (F) is « hangûl »
>from a Corean dictionary and a Corean grammar
>published by the Inalco (Langues O'). Another
>suggested form in some sources, to appromixate
>the pronounciation. is « hangueul »

transliterations of Korean that the Korean NB
insisted upon. Hangul instead of hangûl we will
treat as a spelling error (so you don't have to
file a change form).

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 09:16:18 CDT