RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 15:49:07 CDT

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: ISO 15924 "code"s and "ID"s"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Addison Phillips [wM]

> I don't care about the order, so long as it is stable over time.
Personally I find the
> latter form more logical (with the identifier, i.e. the code, first).

I agree with Addison here: the most important thing is stability, but it
makes sense that the first and second columns be the symbolic code and
the numeric code, especially if this is *the* plain-text version and
normative reference.

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: ISO 15924 "code"s and "ID"s"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 15:51:45 CDT