RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 10:38:36 CDT

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Maybe in reply to: E. Keown: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:14 -0700 2004-05-21, Peter Constable wrote:

>Doug's point is, if there are *lot* of people that will use a separate
>Phoenician block, then that will validate that it was a useful thing to
>do; but if there are *not*, then the unification-camp has little cause
>for concern about existence of distinctly-encoded data.

The unification camp already has to deal with people encoding that
data in Latin transliteration.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Maybe in reply to: E. Keown: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 21 2004 - 10:41:24 CDT