Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Christopher Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 15:23:51 CDT

Next message: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Phoenician numbers"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote:

>
> And in case anyone is thinking of complaining about how much
> discussion of Phoenician there has been on this list, I did try to
> divert the discussion to the Hebrew list right at the start, but
> everyone else wanted to discuss it here.
>
Maybe "everyone" who doesn't think Phoenician is Hebrew.

- C

Next message: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Phoenician numbers"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 15:26:50 CDT