RE: [BULK] - Re: MCW encoding of Hebrew (was RE: Response to Ever son Ph and why Jun 7? fervor)

From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 11:39:25 CDT

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Classification; Phoenician"

Previous message: Dominikus Scherkl \(MGW\): "Re: Fraktur Legibility"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: MCW encoding of Hebrew (was RE: Response to Ever son Ph and why Jun 7? fervor)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
> Behalf Of Dean Snyder
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:55 PM

> But what really strikes me is your ignoring of a most glaring issue -
> these other problematic, legacy encodings or transliterations
> of Hebrew
> ARE DEAD ENDS; they will be gone in 10 years; nobody will be
> using them.
> But Unicode, hopefully, will be around much longer as THE
> international
> STANDARD - and we will be forever stuck with the PROBLEMS IN
> UNICODE you
> are saying we need to create now.

Call me ignorant, then explain to me, in detail please, specifically
what these problems are.

Thanks,

/|/|ike

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Classification; Phoenician"
Previous message: Dominikus Scherkl \(MGW\): "Re: Fraktur Legibility"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: MCW encoding of Hebrew (was RE: Response to Ever son Ph and why Jun 7? fervor)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 11:40:33 CDT