RE: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 15:37:30 CDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Glyph Stance"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Multiple Writing Directions in One Script"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "RE: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 16:09 -0400 2004-05-25, Ernest Cline wrote:

>I don't see it as a unification at all, but merely pointing out that
>there are other characters whose range of glyphs overlaps with the
>range of glyphs of the draughts characters. The representative
>glyphs should of course be the 3D versions.

I agree with you; I didn't express myself well (and wrote "to dot"
instead of "do not")...

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Glyph Stance"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Multiple Writing Directions in One Script"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "RE: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 15:38:14 CDT