RE: [BULK] - Re: Fraktur Legibility (was Re: Response to Everson Phoenician)

From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 19:11:49 CDT

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
> Behalf Of Dean Snyder
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:01 AM

> So, you are saying there are glyph streams in German Fraktur
> that fluent,
> native Germans would have trouble reading. Then, based on
> reasoning being
> applied to Phoenician, Fraktur (or at least Fraktur capitals)
> should be
> separately encoded.

Hmm? This implies that a case is being made that Phoenician should
be encoded solely on the basis of legibility. I do not recall anyone making
such a case. Would you kindly refresh my memory?

Thanks,

/|/|ike

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 19:16:05 CDT