From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 13:56:06 CDT
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Dean Snyder
> >Can we agree to drop the discussion of Fraktur now?
>
> A better way to put this, and the only reason I brought up Fraktur to
> begin with, is to ask, Can we agree to drop the legibility argument
for
> Phoenician? Or at least use it consistent with its use for other
scripts
> encoded in Unicode?
Legibility is *one* consideration. Certainly we must use it consistently
wrt PH as for other cases. But now that we have established what that
means (some people find PH used for Hebrew text to be illegible, so
distinct encoding *may* be warranted), we don't need to refer to Fraktur
any further to apply it to PH.
Peter
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 13:56:55 CDT