Re: Why Fraktur is irrelevant (was RE: Fraktur Legibility (was Re:Response to Everson Phoenician)

From: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 16:50:31 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Phoenician, Fraktur etc"

    Peter Kirk scripsit:

    > So I have an honest question. Can anyone, please, remind me of any
    > technical arguments other than legibility for the separate encoding of
    > Phoenician?

    The same as the general argument for separating any two scripts: the desire
    to create plain-text documents which contain combinations of them. We
    do not identify Greek with Coptic any more because Michael was able to find
    mixed-script documents that the UTC agreed would deserve plain text
    representability.

    -- 
    John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
    Heckler: "Go on, Al, tell 'em all you know.  It won't take long."
    Al Smith: "I'll tell 'em all we *both* know.  It won't take any longer."
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 16:51:33 CDT