From: J Andrew Lipscomb (ewwa@chattanooga.net)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 22:54:33 CDT
Here are some thoughts on the playing-card section:
(1) There are four traditional suit/court patterns in playing cards of
the West: French (spade/heart/diamond/club, king/queen/jack),
Italian/Spanish (sword/cup/coin/baton, king/knight/jack), German
(leaf/heart/bell/acorn, king/overjack/underjack), and Swiss
(shield/flower/bell/acorn, king/overjack/underjack, and a unique rank
called the banner).
Should these four patterns be unified? Overjacks can be unified with
knights, but queens cannot (since Tarot decks use both queens and
knights). Similarly, the underjacks can be unified with just-plain
jacks.
Each suit actually needs 16 or 17 cards--Australian decks often include
pip cards up to 12 in the black suits and 13 in the red (these are used
for the game of 500). It is also necessary to encode two jokers (the
game of Bid Whist, for example, uses a Big Joker as its top trump and a
Little Joker as its second). Finally, the 21 tarots should also be
encoded.
Thus, my suggestion would be—if it is deemed appropriate to unify the
four Western patterns—to encode first four 16-card rows consisting of
four courts and number cards up to 12 in each suit. Then Little Joker,
the tarots in ascending order, Big Joker, and finally the two red
thirteens.
As for the bit about domino diagrams, it seems clear to me that a
diagram is fancy text; for plain text, just the bones themselves will
work (but halves should also be encoded, as a "suit" of dominos is a
likely topic of plain text).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 27 2004 - 22:55:22 CDT