From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Sun Jul 18 2004 - 07:28:03 CDT
On 18/07/2004 08:56, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> At 11:17 PM 7/17/2004, John Cowan wrote:
>
>> Peter Kirk scripsit:
>>
>> > But I think the best thing to do is to drop *all* Hebrew
>> > combining marks; the result of this is valid unpointed Hebrew.
>>
>> I agree.
>
>
> OK, in my last message I was cofused, this was Peter's suggestion and
> Jony had seconded it.
>
> I take it as confirmed then to do *all* marks, accents and points from
> the Hebrew block.
>
> Is it agreed that this should be linked to L/G/C accent folding or
> would it be useful to keep the description separate so that these
> foldings could be invoked separately?
>
> A./
>
>
>
>
>
I can see that there might be cases when the Hebrew folding should be
invoked without other scripts being affected. But I think that anyone
applying a general accent or diacritic folding would expect this to
include all Hebrew (and Arabic, Syriac etc) combining marks.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 18 2004 - 07:29:35 CDT