Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants

From: klists@saphor.de
Date: Mon Sep 06 2004 - 02:05:20 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Deseret in use (?) by "micronation" Molossia"

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Japanese pitch accent representations"
In reply to: Marion Gunn: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 20-09-01, 2004 at 09:52:58AM +0100, Marion Gunn wrote:
> The expression 'glyph variants' would be more common, I believe. mg

Many thanks!

Best regards,

Marc Küster

>
> klists@saphor.de wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > What is the preferred terminology in the Unicode context: "glyph
> > variants" or "glyphic variants"? Both exist in real-life documents.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any views on this!
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marc Küster
>
> --
>
> Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)
> 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an
> Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.
> * mgunn@egt.ie * eamonn@egt.ie *

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Deseret in use (?) by "micronation" Molossia"
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Japanese pitch accent representations"
In reply to: Marion Gunn: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 06 2004 - 02:15:49 CDT