RE: internationalization assumption

From: Rick Cameron (Rick.Cameron@businessobjects.com)
Date: Tue Sep 28 2004 - 14:05:59 CST

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: CYRILIC CAPITAL/SMALL LETTER PE WITH DESCENDER"
  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: CYRILIC CAPITAL/SMALL LETTER PE WITH DESCENDER"

    There's one obvious reason why the products could not be certified for
    Arabic or Hebrew: they have not been tested in a bidirectional environment.
    It's almost certain that they would not work in an acceptable way for these
    locales.

    - rick

    -----Original Message-----
    From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On
    Behalf Of gaudivenetia@highstream.net
    Sent: September 27, 2004 20:22
    To: unicode@unicode.org
    Subject: internationalization assumption

    Hi,

    Here is the assumption.

    There is 2 products for English version. One is coded by UTF8 and the other
    is coded by NON-UTF8. Both products are internationalized readiness.
    Let's say. The test engineer ensures the functionality and validates the
    input and output on major Latin 1 languages, such as German, French,
    Spanish, Italian, as well as Korean, Japanese, Chinese.

    If those products handle all languages as addressed above, could it be
    assumed that the entire character sets in whole latin 1, Han, Cyrillic,
    Arabic.... can be certifed on both products???

    Please make any comments on this assumption.

    regards,
    Tom



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 28 2004 - 14:06:37 CST