RE: Nicest UTF

From: Arcane Jill (arcanejill@ramonsky.com)
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 07:19:52 CST

  • Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: current version of unicode-font"

    Oh for a chip with 21-bit wide registers!
    :-)
    Jill

    -----Original Message-----
    From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
    Behalf Of Antoine Leca
    Sent: 02 December 2004 12:12
    To: Unicode Mailing List
    Subject: Re: Nicest UTF

    There are other factors that might influence your choice.
    For example, the relative cost of using 16-bit entities: on a Pentium it is
    cheap, on more modern X86 processors the price is a bit higher, and on some
    RISC chips it is prohibitive (that is, short may become 32 bits; obviously,
    in such a case, UTF-16 is not really a good choice). On the other extreme,
    you have processors where byte are 16 bits; obviously again, then UTF-8 is
    not optimum there. ;-)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 07:26:55 CST