RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 16:35:03 CST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"

Previous message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Christopher Fynn

> If a Windows application needs to properly display Unicode text for
> languages such as Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, Nepali, Sinhala, Arabic, Urdu
> and so on then it probably needs to support OpenType GSUB and GPOS
lookups.

Not just "probably".

Peter Constable

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Previous message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Reply: Antoine Leca: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 16:40:02 CST