Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

From: Andrew Cunningham (andj_c@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Sat Dec 04 2004 - 06:00:33 CST

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ok,

slight variation on the questions to date.

which opentype fonts (other than Dolous SIL and Code2000) support the
placement of combining diacritics?

Andrew

----
Andrew Cunningham
andj_c at iprimus.com.au
andrewc at vicnet.net.au

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 04 2004 - 06:06:54 CST