Re: U+0023

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:02:34 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"

Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: U+0023"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Re: U+0023"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:23 -0800 2005-04-01, Doug Ewell wrote:

>This was even after I pointed out the availability of both, in both the
>MS-DOS and Windows code pages (we didn't support Unicode yet), and even
>after I pointed out that this was a UI display issue and had no bearing
>on what customers might type.
>
>No, they said. It's DEGREE SIGN.

Except that this doesn't work very well in the plural.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: U+0023"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Re: U+0023"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:04:15 CST