RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)

From: Joe (joe@unicode.org)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:57:46 CST

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>> XCCS (Xerox Character Code Standard)

> That doesn't mean it was unworthy of encoding otherwise

Sure it does. At Xerox we only encoded stuff that was unworthy of encoding otherwise.

Joe

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:58:25 CST