From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Apr 24 2005 - 01:50:37 CST
Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
> A Unicode registry of private characters would clearly need to define
> what should be included, at least in order to avoid abuses. Since the
> technology is able to handle it, it seems best to define the notion
> of what should be considered to be a legitimate character for
> registration, and then accommodate for that.
It's hard enough to get people to agree on what is and isn't an
encodable "character" just within the regular scripts, let alone the
constructed ones.
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 01:53:44 CST