Re: Transliterator

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:54:53 CST

Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Deseret Unicode"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Transliterator"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Transliterator"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Transliterator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela at cs dot tut dot fi> wrote:

>>> [m + DOT ABOVE } for M as in saMgiita
>>
>> U+006D plus U+0304 (m). There is no precomposed version of this.
>
> I think "[m + DOT ABOVE]" means an "m" with a diacritic dot above it,
> not macron. (I'm not sure of the intended meaning of writing "M",
> though.)
>
> That would be U+006D U+0307 in decomposed form, and it has a
> precomposed version: LATIN SMALL LETTER M WITH DOT ABOVE, U+1E41.

Sorry, I read too fast. Jukka is absolutely right.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Deseret Unicode"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Transliterator"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Transliterator"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Transliterator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 25 2005 - 23:08:26 CST