Re: SMTP and unicode

From: Erik van der Poel (erik@vanderpoel.org)
Date: Wed May 18 2005 - 11:40:14 CDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Glagolitic Case-sensitive? What in the Heavens for?"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: what is Latn?"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: SMTP and unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hans Aberg wrote:
> Therefore, people switched to MIME, which
> encodes 8-bit data into 7-bit data.

By the way, email is sometimes converted to 8bit:

From: Otto Stolz <Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de>
To: faraz siddiqi <siddiqifaraz@hotmail.com>
Cc: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: SMTP and unicode
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by unicode.org id
j4HIqXQ7019207

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Glagolitic Case-sensitive? What in the Heavens for?"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: what is Latn?"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: SMTP and unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 18 2005 - 11:41:27 CDT