Re: Ligatures fi and ffi

From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:24:31 CDT

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: AW: Ligatures fi and ffi"

    At 17:44 +0100 2005/06/01, Jon Hanna wrote:
    >>If one so wants, one can add all the glyphs one wants, adding a
    >>property field saying that it is a rendering character.
    >
    >No, we cannot. That would completely change the scope and purpose of Unicode.

    It would change the scope of the current character set in that respect.

    So what do you feel is the purpose of Unicode? -- In the context the
    quote above is taken from, I am speaking about glyphs that are used
    to give proper rendering to semantic characters.

    -- 
       Hans Aberg
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:25:33 CDT