From: Gregg Reynolds (unicode@arabink.com)
Date: Tue Jun 14 2005 - 16:22:46 CDT
Patrick Andries wrote:
> Mete Kural a écrit :
>
>>>Let me predict that someone will want so badly to color the alif portion of
>>>a lam-alif ligature that he makes a gif of what that ligature would look
>>>like and posts it here.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yup, you're right. We have some special needs to color parts of an Arabic word in a different color.
>>
> This is obvious but different from colouring the parts of a ligature.
>
> For obvious need for separate letters, an image from a tutorial I gave
> last week in Beirut:
>
> http://www.hapax.qc.ca/images/Beyrouth-tutoriel-Unicode-24.png
>
> For the next one, I explicitly did not want to colour the two parts of
> the lam-alif ligatures but I could not colour the two parts of the split
> Tamil vowel which I would have loved being able to do (in PowerPoint):
>
> http://www.hapax.qc.ca/images/Beyrouth-tutoriel-Unicode-26.png
>
Ok, here's my two cents: http://www.arabink.com/arabic/main.html
You'll find two images, one with red lam - black alif, and one with red
radicals and black non-radicals, including a red hamza on a black seat.
These are from a PDF doc produced by Omega, which I hacked up a couple
years ago for precisely the purpose of coloring radicals. Instead of
markup, I designed my own encoding using different Latin-1 chars for
radicals/non-radicals, e.g. L/l etc.
-g
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 14 2005 - 16:25:13 CDT
