RE: Letters for Indic transliteration

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 10:09:08 CDT

  • Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: Letters for Indic transliteration"

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
    On Behalf
    > Of Andreas Prilop

    > >> I propose to add (at least) four letters:
    > >> - R with ring below
    > >> - r with ring below
    > >> - L with ring below
    > >> - l with ring below
    > >> in "Latin Extended Additional".
    > >
    > > That can't be done because of normalization.
    >
    > I do not understand this sentence.
    > Can you (or someone else) please explain what you mean by these words?
    >
    > How did the other letters get into this block?

    Check out http://www.unicode.org/faq/char_combmark.html#13; then if you
    have further questions, come back and ask.

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 10:10:14 CDT