From: Richard Wordingham (richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 18:49:46 CDT
Eric Muller wrote:
> Richard Wordingham wrote:
>> But I am not proposing a change to the encoding! The only
>> implementational issues are:
> Along those lines, there is at least one more issue:
>
> 1b) Should the reph of an initial ra be re-ordered across a virama + ZWNJ
> boundary?
And, unsurprisingly, the answer from analogy with Burmese kinzi (Burmese NGA
forms conjuncts with following consonants much as Devanagari RA does) would
seem to be 'No!'. (My example, at
http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Burmese/script/SLessons/SLesson40/lesson.htm , is
possibly suspect. To see it properly requires two SEAsite fonts. Hack
fonts, I'm afraid, but is there yet any alternative for use with pure
Windows software?) If RA did become REPHA, what could the purpose of the
ZWNJ be?
Richard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 18:54:11 CDT