Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation

From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Tue Nov 08 2005 - 17:05:50 CST

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
Next in thread: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

And why bother with +-? It seems sufficient that one knows that a
leading symbol is followed by a non-negative integer identifying the
abstract character.

Hans Aberg

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
Next in thread: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Re: Origin of the U+nnnn notation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 08 2005 - 18:01:52 CST