From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Nov 18 2005 - 10:04:03 CST
At 06:59 -0800 2005-11-18, Doug Ewell wrote:
>There would probably have to be either an orthographic difference of
>some sort (certain words are spelled differently) or a genuine
>literacy threshold (a noticeable percentage of readers of one
>variant are unable to read the other) in order to consider this a
>separate script.
"...in order to consider these variants of the Arabic script
significant enough to encode uniquely in ISO 15924."
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 18 2005 - 10:09:38 CST