From: Richard Wordingham (richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com)
Date: Mon Nov 21 2005 - 02:22:57 CST
Ngwe Tun wrote:
> You said so there is not an issue. I don't agree that.
I don't believe it's a security issue. The misrendering should be
consistent and preserve differences.
> Windows XP Service Pack 2 or VOLT User Community's updated uniscribe
> engine
(usp10.dll) supports both of khmer and burmese. So, We tried it with burmese
language. But It's not perfect yet for burmese.
Which version is this? Service Pack 2 didn't seem to upgrade to usp10.dll.
I'm using an intermediate version that supports Khmer but not Burmese.
> 1) I agree that virama ZWNJ consonant was distinct virama consonant. But
> We
have some issues cases as follows;
....
> 2) Another issues is kinzi problem
> a) In Unicode 4.0, Chapter 10, kinzi assign as nga virama (1004 1039)
> b) and also medial ya, ra, wa, ha assign as virama [ya ra wa ha] (1039
> [101A
101B 101D 101F])
> So We got problem in combination of nga and medial. While combination of
> nga
(1004) and medial wa (1039 101D), it may appear/render wa(101D) + kinzi(1004
1039).
> I guess so it should be add ZWJ after virama, It might be more safe for
collision or selecting ambiguity. I'm right.
> I would like to get responses in these issues.
The Indic list is probably more appropriate. (To join, send message to
ecartis@unicode.org with subject 'subscribe indic'.) There's an attempt to
get a consistent resolution to the rendering problems.
Richard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 21 2005 - 02:27:41 CST