From: Kenneth Whistler (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 22 2005 - 21:45:41 CST
Richard Wordingham asked:
> Do the 5.0 numbers include Phoenician?
> implies that it is included,
If you want to refer to WG2 documents, the definitive one
That is what is going to FDAM ballot, and will define the
contents of the eventual, published Amendment 2.
> but the German position stated in
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/N2990.pdf (15 September 2005)
> implies that it is not.
You are misreading the disposition of comments. The German
vote was negative on the FPDAM2, because it contained
Phoenician. The wording of their comment was unclear, but
by reference to their PDAM comments, it becomes clear that
they were asking that Phoenician be removed from the amendment.
The request to remove Phoenican from the amendment is what
was "Not accepted" -- and as a result, the German vote on
FPDAM2 remained negative.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 22 2005 - 21:51:49 CST