RE: Representative glyphs for combining kannada signs

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2006 - 15:42:11 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: DIY OpenType Re-ordering"

    Antoine Leca wrote:

    > Example 1, Hindi: should the I matra precedes the whole
    > cluster, or only the
    > last freestanding consonant, in the case of a cluster
    > constituted from two
    > or more visually distinct components?

    A *spelling* difference that should be recorded in the sequence
    of characters (in some, not yet standardised, way), quite apart
    from font issues.

    > Example 2, Malayalam: dead RA can come either _before_ the
    > (last part of the) consonant, or _below_ it.

    A *spelling* difference that should be recorded in the sequence
    of characters (in some, not yet standardised, way), quite apart
    from font issues.
     
    > Example 3, Malayalam again: the matra for AU U+0D4C can be
    > shown either as
    > two parts (as depicted in the tables), or only as the right part.

    No it cannot. AU spelled with U+0D4C unambigously has two
    (visible) parts. AU with only the right part is unambiguously
    spelled with U+0D57 (quite regardless of the character name).
    This is already very clear, but apparently needs to be pointed out.

                    /kent k



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 23 2006 - 15:49:38 CST