Re: UTF-7 - I'm not really smarter

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2006 - 09:56:02 CST

  • Next message: Keutgen, Walter: "RE: UTF-7 - I'm not really smarter"

    Kornkreismuster@web.de wrote:
    > Hi!
    >
    > I read the RFC 2152 and I don't understand, wheter this UTF-7 encodes another encoding such as UTF-8 or does encode the Unicode codecharts directly.
    > Reading this RFC, I got the feeling it only encodes UTF-16 encoded Texts, but I think that's not true.

    UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32 are all current means of encoding unicode
    characters.

    UTF-7 is an obsolete means of encoding unicode characters.

    Beyond that I'm not sure what your question means. They all encode the
    full range of unicode if that's what you're getting at.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 28 2006 - 09:53:35 CST