Re: some thoughts on encoding Indic fractions etc.

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 14:30:55 CDT

Next message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: PRI#86 Update"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: PRI#86 Update"
In reply to: N. Ganesan: "some thoughts on encoding Indic fractions etc."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 5/10/2006 4:06 AM, N. Ganesan wrote:
> Reading the Unicode 5.0 charts:
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.0.0/charts/CodeCharts-5.0.0d1.pdf
>
> http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/N3059.pdf
>
> It is great that Balinese letters, a Pallava descendent, are getting
> encoded.
>
> (a)
> Malayalam zero glyph is changing for good. Why is it not shown within
> an yellow block? Is it because it's just a glyph change?
3059 only shows new characters or substantial glyph changes for that
amendment only.
Minor glyph changes are not documented, and neither are changes made at
earlier times.
>
>
I'll let others respond to other aspects of this message.

A./

Next message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: PRI#86 Update"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: PRI#86 Update"
In reply to: N. Ganesan: "some thoughts on encoding Indic fractions etc."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 10 2006 - 14:34:27 CDT