Re: Ogonek vs. hook below (Re: Some questions about Latin diacritics)

• Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: triple diacritic (sch with ligature tie in a German dialect writing document)"
• In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Ogonek vs. hook below (Re: Some questions about Latin diacritics)"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Some questions about Latin diacritics"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 13:09 +0200 2006-06-13, Karl Pentzlin wrote:

>Especially after finding more examples, like
>http://als.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Teuthonischta_a-Variante.jpg
>
>ME> To me, it looks like a subscripted
>ME> dotless i, and doubled in the second instance.
>
>It has that appearance, but as it is called "Haken" (hook) in German,
>I think "COMBINING RIGHT-POINTING HOOK BELOW" resp. "COMBINING DOUBLE
>..." would be the appropriate name.

Hm. Try to find more before we think about a name. That one certainly
wouldn't fit the dotless i.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: Cristian Secară: "Re: are Unicode codes somehow specified in official national linguistic literature ? (worldwide)"
• Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: triple diacritic (sch with ligature tie in a German dialect writing document)"
• In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Ogonek vs. hook below (Re: Some questions about Latin diacritics)"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Some questions about Latin diacritics"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 13 2006 - 07:16:14 CDT