From: Erkki Kolehmainen (erkki.kolehmainen@kotus.fi)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2006 - 06:22:39 CDT
Michael,
you seem to be presently mixing up the UPA and the Landsmålsalfabetet.
This was a UPA addition, and the name was corrected already at the WG2
meeting (at my request). The LMA names have not solidified yet (since
you and Asmus agreed on them not being the best possible candidates,
while you were unable to agree on what would be), but please ensure that
they'll be right at the time of the ballot comments.
Regards, Erkki
Michael Everson wrote:
> At 15:39 -0700 2006-06-25, Richard Cook wrote:
>
>> On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the name of the first of the three proposed letters,
>>> shouldn't that be TURNED E rather than INVERTED E?
>>
>> I don't know, but, what I want to know is, how much closer does this
>> bring us to a Unicode _Finnegans Wake_? That book has a few variously
>> rotated E's, the encoding status of which I've been vaguely thinking
>> about checking.
>>
>> http://www.trentu.ca/jjoyce/
>>
>> But maybe Unicode's resident Irishman already knows the answer?
>
>
> My interest in fictitious languages rests with Quenya and Sindarin.
>
> I'm in Marrakesh right now and can't check about Peter's query, but if
> it's a Uralicist letter based on the Landsmålsalfabetet, I have some
> concerns about the character names.
>
> At dinner I saw a little kitten, orange and skinny like any cat from a
> hot climate. When he sat in profile, he looked like an Egyptian hieroglyph.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 26 2006 - 06:34:08 CDT