From: Kent Karlsson (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jun 28 2006 - 03:48:57 CDT
Alexandros Diamantidis referred to:
Note also the advice on page 6, section 1.9, Rule 8, to use
U+201F DOUBLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK.
I take this a further evidence that that character is NOT
a "glyph variant" of U+201C. I do NOT like the current (d9)
statements in the nameslist:
on 2019 and 201C: "this is the preferred character (as opposed to...)"
on 201B and 201F: "has the same semantics as ..., but differs in
It would be better to state (at least for 201F): "used as opening
mark in some languages"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 28 2006 - 04:36:46 CDT