From: Andrew West (andrewcwest@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2006 - 06:40:04 CST
On 28/09/06, Hans Aberg <haberg@math.su.se> wrote:
>
> This standard is rather limited, as it does not admit indicating
> various androgyny, transsexual and indeterminate sex conditions. I
> think the Unicode character set has a similar shortcoming.
>
U+2640 FEMALE SIGN
U+2642 MALE SIGN
U+26A2 DOUBLED FEMALE SIGN (lesbianism)
U+26A3 DOUBLED MALE SIGN (male homosexuality)
U+26A4 INTERLOCKED FEMALE AND MALE SIGN (bisexuality)
U+26A5 MALE AND FEMALE SIGN (transgendered sexuality)
U+26A6 MALE WITH STROKE SIGN (transgendered sexuality)
U+26A7 MALE WITH STROKE AND MALE AND FEMALE SIGN (transgendered sexuality)
U+26AA MEDIUM WHITE CIRCLE (asexuality, sexless, genderless)
U+26B2 NEUTER
What are we missing ?
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 28 2006 - 06:42:11 CST