From: Omi Azad (write@omiazad.com)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2007 - 07:32:10 CST
I'm using MySQL for many sites and it is perfect for Indic language.
Omi
John H. Jenkins wrote:
> MySQL has had Unicode support since version 4.1. IIRC it isn't
> *fully* in place, but it's pretty solid now. It should be added to
> the Web site as a Unicode-savvy database.
>
> On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Magda Danish (Unicode) wrote:
>
>> Sinead --
>> I am forwarding your question to the Unicode mailing list.
>>
>> Unicode subscribers --
>> Does anyone have an answer to Sinead's email?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Magda
>>
>> ---------------------------
>> Magda Danish
>> Sr. Administrative Director
>> The Unicode Consortium
>> 650-693-3921
>> magda@unicode.org
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Date/Time: Tue Feb 20 07:22:21 CST 2007
>> Contact: sinead.martin@traventec.com
>> Name: Sinead Martin
>> Report Type: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback Opt Subject:
>> MySQl and Unicode support
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I notice that MySQl is not listed on your website as a database that
>> supports Unicode.
>> Would you recommend mySQL as a database that needs to support 10
>> languages incuding Traditional / simplified Chinese and Japanese?
>>
>> I wondered whether the fact that MySQL support only 3 bytes instead
>> of 4 has any significance?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Sinead Martin
>>
>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (End of Report)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ========
> John H. Jenkins
> jenkins@apple.com
> jhjenkins@mac.com
> http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 22 2007 - 07:37:28 CST