Re: U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?

From: John H. Jenkins (jenkins@apple.com)
Date: Thu May 31 2007 - 17:47:06 CDT

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "CLDR 1.5 beta/Unicode 5.0: character fallback substitutions"

Previous message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?"
In reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On May 31, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Shohji Itoh wrote:

> Give me some suggestions.
> Where is the difference ? * U+2FA1A
> * U+2A503
>

The main difference is that U+2FA1A is a compatibility ideograph and
shouldn't be used except for round-trip compatibility with CNS
11643-1992. That is, unless you're converting text from CNS
11643-1992 to Unicode, you should not use this character.

=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
jhjenkins@mac.com
http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "CLDR 1.5 beta/Unicode 5.0: character fallback substitutions"
Previous message: Shohji Itoh: "Re: U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?"
In reply to: Shohji Itoh: "U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 31 2007 - 17:48:41 CDT