From: Behnam (behnam.rassi@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jun 03 2007 - 19:52:48 CDT
How about you and I nuke the Unicode together? You got the bomb and I
of-course, am the terrorist!
Behnam
On 3-Jun-07, at 8:17 PM, Shohji Itoh wrote:
> He can not know recognize difference bettween rhetoric and trick,
> himself, and on wold human region.
> He want to start a war for me. And to now he use many trickable bad
> rhetorics, and say so bad,
> and don't say any good, and said many( with rhetorics) that same
> with "I say some good now for poor you, and heit you ! Hey !! Sun
> of a bich !! A devil or a Satan is so good, for kill you !".
> But I don't know a ML that likes such for him.
> Thank you. Amen.
>
> A, what is the ML that he said ?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Verdy"
> <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>
> To: "'John H. Jenkins'" <jenkins@apple.com>; "'Shohji Itoh'"
> <s_ito88@ybb.ne.jp>
> Cc: "'Unicode MailingList'" <unicode@unicode.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:04 AM
> Subject: RE: U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?
>
>
> Shouldn't there be another list for handling all messages related
> to the
> encoding and unification of the MANY CJKV ideographic characters,
> that would
> also be of interest for IRC members?
>
> For most people on this list, messages related to the mapping between
> Unicode and various national Asian standards for CJK ideographs is
> of little
> interest, because they only care about Unicode itself, and not about
> specific national standards, or other findings in various local
> dictionaries
> and books.
>
> May I suggest a separate cjkv-users@unicode.org list (like there's
> one for
> Hebrew and CLDR issues) where most of those discussions about CJK
> ideographs
> unification would go?
>
> Philippe.
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-
>> bounce@unicode.org] De la
>> part de John H. Jenkins
>> Envoyé : vendredi 1 juin 2007 00:47
>> À : Shohji Itoh
>> Cc : Unicode MailingList
>> Objet : Re: U+2FA1A {-} U+2A503 ?
>>
>>
>> On May 31, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Shohji Itoh wrote:
>>
>> > Give me some suggestions.
>> > Where is the difference ? * U+2FA1A
>> > * U+2A503
>> >
>>
>> The main difference is that U+2FA1A is a compatibility ideograph and
>> shouldn't be used except for round-trip compatibility with CNS
>> 11643-1992. That is, unless you're converting text from CNS
>> 11643-1992 to Unicode, you should not use this character.
>>
>> =====
>> John H. Jenkins
>> jenkins@apple.com
>> jhjenkins@mac.com
>> http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 03 2007 - 19:54:25 CDT