Re: Chuvash numerals

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 03:53:59 CDT

  • Next message: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: Chuvash numerals"

    At 18:45 -0700 2007-08-05, Doug Ewell wrote:
    >William J Poser <wjposer at ldc dot upenn dot edu> wrote:
    >
    >>I don't know a reference on these, but they are
    >>similar to the better documented Hungarian
    >>runic numerals.
    >
    >... which, along with the rest of the rovásirás,
    >appear not to have moved one step closer to
    >encoding for the past 9 years, despite a good
    >initial proposal (N1686) and an excellent
    >follow-up (N1758), plus an intriguing and
    >thorough tour of the complexities of Old
    >Hungarian ligation in N2147. I've wondered many
    >times what could possibly be missing.

    Resources to work on the encoding have been missing.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 06 2007 - 03:58:29 CDT