From: Dmitry Turin (unicode20@narod.ru)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2007 - 04:16:35 CDT
Sergey,
>> Impossibility to write commonly used formulas with root and
>> fraction _in textual_ file looks poorly, archaically too.
>> But symbols 'root' and 'fraction' exist! Why nobody guess
>> to interprete them as control symbol.
>> Let's agree to display expression "(a+b+c)\(d+e)" as
>> a+b+c
>> -----
>> d+e
>>
>>and expression "a#(b+c)" (where # is mark of root) as
>>
>> a ___
>> \/b+c
SM> There is linear format used by Microsoft Office and described in
SM> http://unicode.org/notes/tn28/ by Murray Sargent. It is very close to
SM> natural representation of math formulas and what you describe. But it
SM> still does not declare any rendering rules, only semantics.
JH> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr25/
JH> http://www.unicode.org/notes/tn28/
But these are the markup language once again.
Plain text is used in _all_ type of documents
(biologistic one, economistic one, texts of schoolchildren),
and manufactorers of software must be prevented from embeding of
_particular_ markup language into all system.
Dmitry Turin
Unicode2 (2.1.0) http://unicode2.chat.ru
HTML6 (6.4.1) http://html60.chat.ru
SQL4 (4.3.0) http://sql40.chat.ru
Computer2 (2.0.3) http://computer20.chat.ru
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 27 2007 - 04:21:28 CDT