From: Don Osborn (dzo@bisharat.net)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 09:28:07 CDT
I won't even try to sort all this out but from a quick glance at some of the thread, 2 quick reactions:
1) Asmus may have a point:
> On 9/28/2007 11:40 PM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
...
>
> BTW, I got that your initial reply was tongue-in-cheek, but I actually
> think it would not be wasted effort to have someone come up with a
> well-reasoned proposal.
>
...
2) Bob may have hit on a perfect April 1 proposal: Combining appendages for symbols bloc (fun for kids of all ages!)
> On 9/29/2007 3:34 AM, Bob_Hallissy@sil.org wrote:
...
> Ah, clearly then what is needed is
>
> 20F0;COMBINING ENCLOSING FISH;Me;0;NSM;;;;;N;;;;;
>
> or perhaps, using more recent conventions:
>
> 20F0;FAITH SIGN FISH;Cf;0;BN;;;;;N;;;;;
>
> An appropriate font design would choose contextual variants (feet,
> horns,
> etc.) based on the enclosed text.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 29 2007 - 09:32:26 CDT