From: John H. Jenkins (jenkins@apple.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 13:21:06 CST
On Dec 6, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Otto Stolz wrote:
> Of course, you could come up with a Unicode-capable, standard
> conforming
> rot13 implementation -- but what purpose could it ever serve? It would
> not disguise strings written in the n-1 non-Latin scripts, where n >
> 60.
> So, if something useful is desired, you would have to define a rot-n
> scheme for every Script in Unicode, and put all of those schemes in a
> rot13 successor program. If such a programm would ever be devised,
> it could certainly be made standard conforming (including clause C6).
>
What you should use is rot32768 (applied on a per-plane basis). Since
the BMP and Plane 2 are both pretty full, most actual text would at
least not contain large numbers of undefined characters (and Latin
text would largely turn into Chinese, of course). :-)
=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 06 2007 - 13:23:03 CST