RE: Questions regarding U+FD3E ORNATE LEFT PARENTHESIS and U+FD3F ORNATE RIGHT PARENTHESIS

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2007 - 08:25:05 CST

  • Next message: Behnam: "Re: Questions regarding U+FD3E ORNATE LEFT PARENTHESIS and U+FD3F ORNATE RIGHT PARENTHESIS"

     
    > And Kent responded, for which I must supply a few corrections:
    >
    > > 1) These characters were relatively recently encoded in Unicode,
    >
    > False. They date from the original publication of 10646-1:1993
    > (and Unicode 1.1 as well, of course).

    I stand corrected. (I should have checked DerivedAge.txt.)

    In another message Ken wrote (in a chapter of "Every character has
    a histroy" ;-):

    > The assignment of gc=Ps and gc=Pe was not a mistake. All
    > left/right parenthesis and bracket pairs are given gc=Ps for
    > the "LEFT" of the pair and gc=Pe for the "RIGHT" of the pair.

    Perhaps not a mistake, but part of the oversight. Now that mirroring
    cannot be changed, and the use for ORNATE parentheses is mostly in
    RTL contexts, it would be more logical to swap these properties (and
    properties that depend on the Ps/Pe values). In addition to adding a
    note (in NamesList.txt) that these characters are intended for use
    in RTL contexts. Anomalies resulting from using these in LTR contexts
    would then have to be dealt with by other means (by someone editing
    the text), if needed; rather than having to deal with those anomalies
    in the expectedly more common case of RTL usage (which I venture to
    guess isn't actually done).

            Ever trying to fix things...
            /kent k



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 08 2007 - 08:30:32 CST