From: Andreas Stötzner (as@signographie.de)
Date: Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:38:04 CST
Am 31.12.2007 um 01:13 schrieb James Kass:
> Dictionaries!? I had never seen this symbol U+2697, even though
> I once worked in an industry related to chemistry, other than
> as a device in chemical supply house company logos.
>
> Probably the original proposal for encoding this symbol as a
> character shows examples of this symbol in running text, but,
> in spite of searching the ISO archives of proposals, I could not
> find that original proposal.
See http://www.signographie.de/cms/upload/fundstuecke/2697_exmpl.jpg
for an example.
>
> In order for any of those interesting, unencoded alchemical
> symbols to become characters in the Unicode sense of the word,
> someone will
> need to collect,
– done,
> organize,
– done,
> make a formal proposal,
> and follow it through the process until it is approved.
no problem.
estimated costs: ca. $6500.
Who’ll fund it?
;-)
and a happy New Year to all of you,
A:S
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:41:45 CST
